Monday, 25 April 2011
Monday, 11 April 2011
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Bearing in mind that my film falls beneath a more 'art house' style, i can not see it being produced by any mainstream film studios. So bearing in mind that the film is highly unlikely to reach the Mass market, i would need to converge with a film company who specializes in independent films.
these are the possibilities:
Focus Features (formerly USA Films, Universal Focus and Good Machine) is the art housefilms division of NBC Universal's Universal Pictures, and acts as both a producer and distributor for its own films and a distributor for foreign films.
Working Title Films is a British film production company, based in London, UK. The company was founded by Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe in 1983. It produces feature films with notable films such as Billy Elliot, Shaun of the Dead and The Calcium Kid under it's belt and produces several television productions.
Despite all producing independent films, I think 'Working Title Films' would be most interested. Being a British written, directed and produced film, 'Seraphim' would not become an oddity among the other known titles produced by this company. The most convenient would be to go for 'Focus features' as previously stated, they distribute their own films. This means i wouldn't have to be responsible for releasing the film to the public, through theatrical release or DVD.
In terms of advertising, in the case that neither companies contribute, due to a predictable lower budget, i would have to rely more on social networks e.g. Myspace and facebook, printable advertising e.g posters, billboards, in addition to word of mouth.
If my film was accepted by one of these production companies I would hope to have it premier at 'The Sundance Film Festival. This is a film festival that takes place annually in the state of Utah, in the United Staes. It is the largest independent cinema festival in the United States.
Tuesday, 5 April 2011
How does your media product represent particular social groups?
The main character (William) vaguely represents the social group of urban teenagers, although he conveys more meaning. He seems isolated, misunderstood, and riddled, but this is just a phase everyone goes through as they grow up, right?
As i compare William in my opening with the character of Jimmy Smith (8 Mile) in that opening, i begin to see similar traits. Both of these characters share the characteristic of isolation, even though Jimmy is beyond his teenage years. This tells me that, although people are generally categorized into specific social groups, human beings are all capable of experiencing the same feelings.
Both characters spend a large proportion of the opening alone, either by personal choice or social influence. The difference between the two though is that Jimmy's isolation is emphasised through the fact that he's practically the only white male within the local underground hip-hop scene, so there are clues to possible social influences. On the other hand, William seems to have taken solitary by choice, seeing as he hasn't been outcast by all social groups; we see his mate 'Jonesy' at the end of the sequence.
Despite initial reasons of isolation, both characters aren't as purposeless as you may think. Deeper thought is conveyed within both characters, for example- the shot of William, alike Jimmy, staring into the mirror long and hard, as though he's trying to find something. Jimmy aspires to be a well known hip-hop artist and has the skill aswell as mental clarity to reinforce manifestations, but his path is blurred and it's a struggle to find his way. William's block is more obscure, as he does not actually realise his potential and what he's destined to achieve if he simply grasps the opportunity. In this respect, William's dilemma is far more psychological. It is quite ironic that both characters problems present a strength in the other's world, reinforcing how non-beneficial isolation has become.
I believe this shows that problems arise within every persons life, despite social background or culture. Opportunities come and go, but it takes realisation and drive to grasp them
As i compare William in my opening with the character of Jimmy Smith (8 Mile) in that opening, i begin to see similar traits. Both of these characters share the characteristic of isolation, even though Jimmy is beyond his teenage years. This tells me that, although people are generally categorized into specific social groups, human beings are all capable of experiencing the same feelings.
Both characters spend a large proportion of the opening alone, either by personal choice or social influence. The difference between the two though is that Jimmy's isolation is emphasised through the fact that he's practically the only white male within the local underground hip-hop scene, so there are clues to possible social influences. On the other hand, William seems to have taken solitary by choice, seeing as he hasn't been outcast by all social groups; we see his mate 'Jonesy' at the end of the sequence.
Despite initial reasons of isolation, both characters aren't as purposeless as you may think. Deeper thought is conveyed within both characters, for example- the shot of William, alike Jimmy, staring into the mirror long and hard, as though he's trying to find something. Jimmy aspires to be a well known hip-hop artist and has the skill aswell as mental clarity to reinforce manifestations, but his path is blurred and it's a struggle to find his way. William's block is more obscure, as he does not actually realise his potential and what he's destined to achieve if he simply grasps the opportunity. In this respect, William's dilemma is far more psychological. It is quite ironic that both characters problems present a strength in the other's world, reinforcing how non-beneficial isolation has become.I believe this shows that problems arise within every persons life, despite social background or culture. Opportunities come and go, but it takes realisation and drive to grasp them
Monday, 4 April 2011
evaluation questions
In the evaluation the following questions must be answered:
In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
How does your media product represent particular social groups?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Who would be the audience for your media product?
How did you attract/address your audience?
What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression
from it to the full product?
I think if i were to answer these questions only in essay or short answer form, the audience wouldn't have a real idea of what's going on in my head. So i think if i answer at least a couple, if not all, of my questions in the form of a director's cut, it will become far more interesting as well as understandable.
In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
How does your media product represent particular social groups?
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Who would be the audience for your media product?
How did you attract/address your audience?
What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression
from it to the full product?
I think if i were to answer these questions only in essay or short answer form, the audience wouldn't have a real idea of what's going on in my head. So i think if i answer at least a couple, if not all, of my questions in the form of a director's cut, it will become far more interesting as well as understandable.
Sunday, 3 April 2011
audience feedback
- "actors were good. Performance didn't look fake at all! logo was good and had relevance."
- "good range of movement, shots follow him then turn into being stationary. Great use of stopping music in the market to add effect. Could have been more innovative in the way you move from location to location"
- "good use of camera angles although the music seemed a bit fast for the pace of editing. I like the change of colour in the last shot. Overall it's pretty interesting though."
- "really cool! I like the man in the suit with no face as it draws in the audience. good editing with a range of shot angles. Music also seems to fit the genre of the film that you're going for. So good, i wish it was a real film!"
- "used a great range of camera shots which really help to create a sense of mystery. The use of the black and white effect was working well with the effect you were trying to get across, and the way that you fitted in the titles worked well with piece."
- "like the camera shots used-especially the one from above and the graffiti shots. Ending was interesting and also quite funny as well."
- "I liked the idea with the creepy man as it was something different. The reflection in the mirror was also effective + I liked the scene at the end walking through the deserted market."
- " The mise-en-scene is used well e.g. the low key lighting fits well with the music and storyline."
- "I would have kept it all black and white. Spinning in the market was awesome. Good shots with holly and the man walking under."
- "some excellent shots. Use of black and white with location works very well. The last few shots make it seem a bit like a trailer rather than an opening. An excellent piece of work though! would love to see more."
- Really good shots & editing. Black & white mise-en-scene is very effective with the character contrasting with the background. Very good, well done!"
I have read these criticisms thoroughly and agree to the accuracy of the vast majority. It seems that the black & white effect was rather popular as well as the range of shots. In concern of the ending making the piece seem like i trailor, i had done this purposely as explained in the video, the next sequence of shots after the opening reveal a different perspective on William's life and so i thought it would be fitting to place in a split, so the audience would clarify a contrast. Overall, I'm very pleased with the reactions!
Saturday, 2 April 2011
Friday, 1 April 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



